The Strategy Pattern

The Strategy Pattern is a behavioral design pattern from the book Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software”. It defines a family of algorithms and encapsulates them in objects.

The Strategy Pattern is heavily used in the Standard Template Library.

The Strategy Pattern

Purpose

Defines a family of algorithms and encapsulates them in objects

Also known as

Policy

Use case

Different variations of an algorithm are needed
The client does not need to know the algorithm
The algorithm should be exchangeable at the run time of a program

Structure

Strategy

Defines the interface for the family of algorithms

ConcreteStrategy

Implements an algorithm

Context

Manages a reference to a ConcreteStrategy
Has a ConcreteStrategy

The Context has a ConcreteStrategy that is encapsulated in an object. The ConcreteStrategy implements the interface of Strategy. Typically, the ConcreteStrategy can be adjusted during run time.

Modernes C++ Mentoring

"Fundamentals for C++ Professionals" (open)

"Design Patterns and Architectural Patterns with C++" (open)

"C++20: Get the Details" (open)

"Concurrency with Modern C++" (open)

"Generic Programming (Templates) with C++": October 2024

"Embedded Programming with Modern C++": October 2024

"Clean Code: Best Practices for Modern C++": March 2025

Do you want to stay informed: Subscribe.

Example

The following example strategy.cpp uses three concrete strategies and follows the naming conventions in the previous image.

// strategy.cpp

#include <iostream>
#include <memory>
#include <utility>

class Strategy {
public:
    virtual void execute() = 0;                           // (4)
    virtual ~Strategy() {}
};

class Context {
    std::unique_ptr<Strategy> strat{};                    // (1)
public:                                                   
    void setStrategy(std::unique_ptr<Strategy> strat_)  { // (2)
        strat = std::move(strat_); }
    }
    void strategy()  { if (strat) strat->execute(); }     // (3)
};

class Strategy1 : public Strategy {
public:
    void execute() { std::cout << "Strategy1 executed\n"; }
};

class Strategy2 : public Strategy {
public:
    void execute() { std::cout << "Strategy2 executed\n"; }
};

class Strategy3 : public Strategy {
public:
    void execute() { std::cout << "Strategy3 executed\n"; }
};

int main() {

    std::cout << '\n';

    Context k;

    k.setStrategy(std::make_unique<Strategy1>());
    k.strategy();

    k.setStrategy(std::make_unique<Strategy2>());
    k.strategy();

    k.setStrategy(std::make_unique<Strategy3>());
    k.strategy();

    std::cout << '\n';

}

Context has a strategy (line 1) that can be set (line 2) and can be executed (line 3). Each strategy has to support the member function execute (line 4). The main program uses three concrete strategies, sets them, and executes them. Here is the output of the program.

Usage in C++

The Strategy Pattern is heavily used in the Standard Template Library. In the case of templates, we call it Policy.

A policy is a generic function or class whose behavior can be configured. Typically, there are default values for the policy parameters. std::vector and std::unordered_map exemplifies policies in C++.

template<class T, class Allocator = std::allocator<T>>          // (1)
class vector; 

template<class Key,
    class T,
    class Hash = std::hash<Key>,                               // (3)
    class KeyEqual = std::equal_to<Key>,                       // (4)
    class allocator = std::allocator<std::pair<const Key, T>>  // (2)
class unordered_map;

This means each container has a default allocator for its elements depending on T (line 1) or on std::pair<const Key, T> (line 2). Additionally, std::unorderd_map has a default hash function (line 3) and a default equal function (4). The hash function calculates the hash value based on the key, and the equal function deals with collisions in the buckets. My previous post “Hash Functions” gives you more information about std::unordered_map.

Consequentially, you can use a user-defined data type such as MyInt as a key in a std::unordered_map.

// templatesPolicy.cpp

#include <iostream>
#include <unordered_map>

struct MyInt{
    explicit MyInt(int v):val(v){}
    int val;
};

struct MyHash{                                                        // (1)
    std::size_t operator()(MyInt m) const {
        std::hash<int> hashVal;
        return hashVal(m.val);
    }
};

struct MyEqual{
    bool operator () (const MyInt& fir, const MyInt& sec) const {      // (2)
        return fir.val == sec.val;
    }
};

std::ostream& operator << (std::ostream& strm, const MyInt& myIn){     // (3)
    strm << "MyInt(" << myIn.val << ")";
    return strm;
}

int main(){

    std::cout << '\n';

    using MyIntMap = std::unordered_map<MyInt, int, MyHash, MyEqual>;  // (4)

    std::cout << "MyIntMap: ";
    MyIntMap myMap{{MyInt(-2), -2}, {MyInt(-1), -1}, {MyInt(0), 0}, {MyInt(1), 1}};

    for(auto m : myMap) std::cout << '{' << m.first << ", " << m.second << "}";

    std::cout << "\n\n";

}

I implemented the hash function (line 1), and the equal function (line 2) as a function object and overloaded, for convenience reasons, the output operator (line 3). Line 4 creates out of all components a new type MyIntMap, that uses MyInt as a key. The following screenshot shows the output of the instance myMap.

Related Patterns

The Template Method and Strategy Pattern use cases are pretty similar. Both patterns enable it to provide variations of an algorithm. The Template Method is based on a class level by subclassing, and the Strategy Pattern on an object level by composition. The Strategy Pattern gets is various strategies as objects and can, therefore, exchange its strategies at run time. The Template Method inverts the control flow, following the hollywood principle: “Don’t call us, we will call you”. The Strategy Pattern is often a black box. It allows you to replace one strategy with another without knowing its details.
The Bridge Pattern and the Strategy Pattern have identical structures but different intents. The Bridge Pattern is a structural pattern and aims to decouple physical dependencies, the Strategy Pattern is a behavioral pattern that decouples logical dependencies and allows to injection of external implementations.

Let’s talk about the pros and cons of the Strategy Pattern.

Pros and Cons

Pros

Algorithms are encapsulated in objects and can be exchanged during run time
Adding new strategies is easy. You only have to implement a new strategy.
The Strategy Pattern replaces conditional execution based on if/else statements or switch statements
Callables are often lightweight implementations for strategies in C++:

// sortVariations.cpp

#include <algorithm>
#include <iostream>
#include <string>
#include <vector>

bool greater(const std::string& first, const std::string& second) {
    return first > second;
}

int main(){

    std::vector<std::string> myStrings{"Only", "for", "testing", "purpose", "."};

    // sort ascending
    std::sort(myStrings.begin(), myStrings.end());

    // sort descending                           // (1)
    std::sort(myStrings.begin(), myStrings.end(), greater);
    std::sort(myStrings.begin(), myStrings.end(), std::greater<std::string>());
    std::sort(myStrings.begin(), myStrings.end(), [](const std::string& first, const std::string& second) {
                                                      return first > second; 
                                                    });

    // sort based on the length of the strings
    std::sort(myStrings.begin(), myStrings.end(), [](const std::string& first, const std::string& second) {
                                                      return first.length() < second.length(); 
                                                    });

}

The program uses the function greater, the predefined function object std::greater<std::string>, and a lambda expression (line 1) to sort a std::vector<std::string> in descending way. The callables are, in this example, binary predicates.

Cons

Clients must know and choose the right strategy
The number of objects (strategies) increases heavily

What’s Next?

I presented in my last posts the following Design Patterns from the seminal book “Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software“.

The ones listed here are the ones most relevant in my past. In my next post, I will write about idioms in C++. An idiom is an implementation of an architecture or design pattern in a concrete programming language.

Post Views: 7,857

Thanks a lot to my Patreon Supporters: Matt Braun, Roman Postanciuc, Tobias Zindl, G Prvulovic, Reinhold Dröge, Abernitzke, Frank Grimm, Sakib, Broeserl, António Pina, Sergey Agafyin, Андрей Бурмистров, Jake, GS, Lawton Shoemake, Jozo Leko, John Breland, Venkat Nandam, Jose Francisco, Douglas Tinkham, Kuchlong Kuchlong, Robert Blanch, Truels Wissneth, Mario Luoni, Friedrich Huber, lennonli, Pramod Tikare Muralidhara, Peter Ware, Daniel Hufschläger, Alessandro Pezzato, Bob Perry, Satish Vangipuram, Andi Ireland, Richard Ohnemus, Michael Dunsky, Leo Goodstadt, John Wiederhirn, Yacob Cohen-Arazi, Florian Tischler, Robin Furness, Michael Young, Holger Detering, Bernd Mühlhaus, Stephen Kelley, Kyle Dean, Tusar Palauri, Juan Dent, George Liao, Daniel Ceperley, Jon T Hess, Stephen Totten, Wolfgang Fütterer, Matthias Grün, Phillip Diekmann, Ben Atakora, Ann Shatoff, Rob North, Bhavith C Achar, Marco Parri Empoli, Philipp Lenk, Charles-Jianye Chen, Keith Jeffery, Matt Godbolt, and Honey Sukesan.

Thanks, in particular, to Jon Hess, Lakshman, Christian Wittenhorst, Sherhy Pyton, Dendi Suhubdy, Sudhakar Belagurusamy, Richard Sargeant, Rusty Fleming, John Nebel, Mipko, Alicja Kaminska, Slavko Radman, and David Poole.

My special thanks to Embarcadero
My special thanks to PVS-Studio
My special thanks to Tipi.build
My special thanks to Take Up Code
My special thanks to SHAVEDYAKS