I often teach the basics to templates. Templates are special. Therefore, I encounter many misconceptions which cause surprises. Here are a few of them.
Today, I finish the C++ core guidelines rules to templates with a big surprise for many C++ developers. I write about the specialisation of function templates.
Today, I write about the few remaining rules to templates. Because a collective name is missing, they put the heterogenous rules to templates in the section other. The rules are about best practices but also about surprises.
My mini-series about programming at compile time started with template metaprogramming, continued with the type-traits library, and ends today with constant expressions (constexpr).
The type-traits library supports type checks, type comparisons, and type modifications at compile time. Right! Today, I write about type modifications at compile time.
My journey through programming at compile time began in the last posts with template metaprogramming. Today, I jump from C++98 to C++11. This is a jump to the type-traits library which is template metaprogramming in a standardised way.
Today, I will continue my introduction to programming at compile time. The last post started with template metaprogramming. Here is where I pick-up today and finish.
Yes, you read it correctly. Today, I write about template metaprogramming which is programming with types and not values.
In my concurrency class, I use more than 60 programs. Most of the programs consist of a single source file. I'm quite curious if the static code analysis tool CppDepend can find any issues in my sources. Let me try it out.
Variadic templates are a typical feature of C++: from the users perspective they are easy to use, but from the implementor's perspective they look quite scary. Today's post is mainly about the implementor's perspective.
Currently are 190 guests and no members online
Kubik-Rubik Joomla! Extensions